AI Use Case Assessment Worksheet
Use Case Name: _________________________________
Date: _________________________________
Assessor: _________________________________
Dimension 1: Desirability — Is the Problem Worth Solving?
Problem Statement (Without Mentioning AI)
What is the actual business problem?
Who owns this problem?
What's the current cost of this problem?
- Time cost: _________________________________
- Money cost: _________________________________
- Error cost: _________________________________
What's the cost of doing nothing?
What does "solved" look like?
Success Metrics
Baseline Performance (Current State):
- Metric 1: _________________________________ = _________________________________
- Metric 2: _________________________________ = _________________________________
- Metric 3: _________________________________ = _________________________________
Target Performance (Success State):
- Metric 1: _________________________________ = _________________________________
- Metric 2: _________________________________ = _________________________________
- Metric 3: _________________________________ = _________________________________
How will we measure success?
- Quantitative metric (specify): _________________________________
- Qualitative feedback (specify): _________________________________
- Business impact (specify): _________________________________
Strategic Alignment
- Aligns with business priorities
- Executive sponsorship confirmed
- Users are engaged and supportive
- Clear business owner identified
Desirability Score (1-10)
| Criterion | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Quantified Impact | ___ / 10 | |
| Strategic Alignment | ___ / 10 | |
| Success Metrics Clarity | ___ / 10 | |
| Business Owner Commitment | ___ / 10 | |
| TOTAL | ___ / 40 |
Desirability Decision:
- ✅ PASS (Score ≥30): Problem is worth solving
- 🟡 REVIEW (Score 20-29): Needs refinement
- ❌ FAIL (Score <20): Not worth solving
Dimension 2: Feasibility — Can We Technically Do This?
Data Reality Check
Do we HAVE the data we need? (Not "can we collect it"—do we HAVE it?)
- Yes, data exists
- No, data doesn't exist
- Partial, some data exists
Data Details:
- Data source: _________________________________
- Data owner: _________________________________
- Historical depth: _________________________________
- Volume: _________________________________ records
- Update frequency: _________________________________
Data Quality:
- Labeled training data available
- Data completeness: _____% (target: >85%)
- Data accuracy: _____% (target: >85%)
- Data freshness: _____ (how recent?)
- Missing values: _____% (target: <15%)
Data Access:
- Legal/compliance approval obtained
- Privacy review completed
- Data owner has granted access
- Technical access is feasible
Technical Fit
Does this problem require AI, or would rules/heuristics work?
- Problem is ambiguous/probabilistic → AI needed
- Rules can fully capture logic → No AI needed
- Some error is acceptable → AI suitable
- Pattern exists in historical data → AI suitable
- Humans struggle to scale decisions → AI suitable
Simpler Solutions Tested:
- _________________________________ → Result: _________________________________
- _________________________________ → Result: _________________________________
- _________________________________ → Result: _________________________________
Why simpler solutions are insufficient:
Technical Skills:
- Team has required ML/AI skills
- Can acquire skills through training
- Need to hire external expertise
- Skills gap is a blocker
Integration Feasibility:
- Can integrate with existing systems
- No major technical blockers
- Infrastructure is ready
- API/access available
Compliance & Governance
- GDPR/compliance review completed
- Security sign-off obtained
- Data residency requirements met
- Industry regulations considered
- Audit logging requirements defined
Feasibility Score (1-10)
| Criterion | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Data Availability | ___ / 10 | |
| Data Quality | ___ / 10 | |
| Technical Skills | ___ / 10 | |
| Integration Feasibility | ___ / 10 | |
| Compliance Readiness | ___ / 10 | |
| TOTAL | ___ / 50 |
Feasibility Decision:
- ✅ PASS (Score ≥40): Technically feasible
- 🟡 REVIEW (Score 30-39): Needs PoC to validate
- ❌ FAIL (Score <30): Not feasible right now
Dimension 3: Viability — Can We Sustain This?
ROI Calculation
Annual Benefit (What will be saved/earned):
- Benefit 1: _________________________________ = €_____ / year
- Benefit 2: _________________________________ = €_____ / year
- Benefit 3: _________________________________ = €_____ / year
- Total Annual Benefit: €_____ / year
Implementation Cost (One-time):
- Development: €_____
- Infrastructure setup: €_____
- Team training: €_____
- Total Implementation Cost: €_____
Operating Cost (Ongoing, per year):
- Infrastructure: €_____ / year
- Team (FTE): €_____ / year
- Maintenance: €_____ / year
- Total Operating Cost: €_____ / year
Payback Period:
- Year 1: €_____ (benefit) - €_____ (implementation) - €_____ (ops) = €_____
- Year 2: €_____ (benefit) - €_____ (ops) = €_____
- Payback achieved in: _____ months
Risk-Adjusted Scenario (50% as good):
- Annual benefit (50%): €_____ / year
- Payback period: _____ months
- Still positive? [ ] Yes [ ] No
Team & Skills
- Team is assigned
- Team has required skills
- Training plan is defined
- Can maintain long-term
- Succession plan exists
Change Management
- Users are engaged
- Process changes are defined
- Training plan for users
- Adoption strategy exists
- Organization is ready
Viability Score (1-10)
| Criterion | Score (1-10) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ROI Positive | ___ / 10 | |
| Payback Period | ___ / 10 | |
| Team Readiness | ___ / 10 | |
| Change Management | ___ / 10 | |
| TOTAL | ___ / 40 |
Viability Decision:
- ✅ PASS (Score ≥30): Financially justified
- 🟡 REVIEW (Score 20-29): Needs refinement
- ❌ FAIL (Score <20): Not financially justified
AI Level Selection
Recommended AI Level:
- Level 0: No AI needed (rules/heuristics)
- Level 1: Analytics/BI (statistical models)
- Level 2: AI-Supported (human decides, AI suggests)
- Level 3: AI-Integrated (AI decides, embedded in workflow)
- Level 4: Advanced ML (real-time, complex patterns)
- Level 5: Agentic AI (autonomous execution)
Why this level?
Estimated Cost: €_____
Estimated Timeline: _____ weeks/months
Can we start simpler and upgrade later?
- Yes, start at Level _____
- No, need this level from day one
Overall Assessment
Summary Scores
| Dimension | Score | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Desirability | ___ / 40 | ✅ / 🟡 / ❌ |
| Feasibility | ___ / 50 | ✅ / 🟡 / ❌ |
| Viability | ___ / 40 | ✅ / 🟡 / ❌ |
| TOTAL | ___ / 130 |
Final Recommendation
- ✅ GO - Proceed to build (all dimensions pass)
- 🟡 POC - Run 2-4 week proof-of-concept (uncertainty exists)
- 🔄 PIVOT - Change approach (simpler level, different solution)
- ❌ STOP - Not viable right now (come back in 6-12 months)
Reasoning
Next Steps
Approved By
- Business Owner: _________________ Date: _______
- Technical Lead: _________________ Date: _______
- Finance Lead: _________________ Date: _______
- AI Architect: _________________ Date: _______